Panels

Justification for Regulation Ancillary Jurisdiction Universal Service CALEA

Panel 2: Ancillary Jurisdiction

What are the arguments for and against FCC's exercise of "ancillary jurisdiction" over IP-enabled services, as such services are defined in n.1 of the NPRM? Are there new ways of thinking about the FCC's role and/or the jurisdictional approach suggested by the NPRM (e.g., a "layers" approach) that might be useful? Can the FCC preempt state actions without itself acting?

 

Resources

• FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for IP Enabled Services

News

 

©2004 Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law | Last Updated July 1, 2004

 

AboutScheduleParticipantsSessionsContact